<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:01:45 -0500 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lipid.org/newcommunity/rss_show_blogs.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>My Blogs</title>
    <description>The is all Blogs from lipid.org.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>NLA(webmaster@leadingstar.com)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>NLA(webmaster@leadingstar.com)</webMaster>
    <generator>RSS Feed Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Lipidaholics Case 251</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Lipidaholics: Please go over to the Groups page and click on lipidaholics group&amp;nbsp;to read the latest case discussion which gets into the importance of HDL particle size as both a risk factor and goal of therapy. Most of all please post any comments. I believe there is a lot of misinformation out there on HDL sizes, especially by labs offering such tests&amp;nbsp;- what they mean and what to do about them. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Happy Lipiding,&amp;nbsp; TD</p> ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.lipid.org/newcommunity/blogs/entry/Lipidaholics-Case-251</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 7 Feb 2010 8:42:31 EST </pubDate>
      <author> </author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lipid.org/newcommunity/blogs/entry/Lipidaholics-Case-251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
