<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:54:32 -0500 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://www.lipid.org/newcommunity/rss_show_blogs.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>My Blogs</title>
    <description>The is all Blogs from lipid.org.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>NLA(pardeep.kapoor@infoproworldwide.com)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>NLA(pardeep.kapoor@infoproworldwide.com)</webMaster>
    <generator>RSS Feed Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>The end of the lipid era ??????</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The most recent Lipidaholics Anonymous Case has been posted under Groups: Lipidaholics. I pose the following question: Please surprise me with the correct answer: Who said and when did they say: &amp;quot;In a desire to use more specific terminology, certain durable nouns from the lipid era should not be discarded.&amp;quot; The nouns being referred to are hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Next question - if that&amp;nbsp;is true, when did the lipid era end and what followed it?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Third and final question: how many practicing physicians and lipidologists even know the lipid era has ended?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;For the answer you have to read the case - Trust me you will be rewarded and perhaps very surprised.Happy New Year,&amp;nbsp; Tom Dayspring</p> ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.lipid.org/newcommunity/blogs/entry/The-end-of-the-lipid-era-</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Jan 2010 19:50:58 CST </pubDate>
      <author> </author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lipid.org/newcommunity/blogs/entry/The-end-of-the-lipid-era-</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>